Post by I. Sam on Sept 6, 2022 10:40:58 GMT
This conversation is a game. This game is created with conversations in mind. The conversations of the age of the internet seem miserable. The heights of the opensource community appear to have been achieved through some pretty draconian means. I created this conversation space because I am an activist. This game is built upon the limitations and strengths and washing tides of my imagination. This game is built from my own therapy results. I want to work out some of those internet conversation kinks, because this is a business space and I want you to have a reason to return here. I feel like that's a very important part of LOCATION/LOCATION/LOCATION - a business common sense knowledge. [Here is a full listing of the art therapy program I built for myself, the directions I was given being do what feels right and what feels right would be capitalizing on fair-usable source.] Hopefully the last board, will be populated with psychic health gurus willing to peddle their wares in a marketplace that can experiment with their opinions in a space just a subboard away. !xx- This link goes here -xx! That is a knowable part of this forum having a self-advertisement board [self advertisement board link here]
You will play the part of a senator. Whether you are the nhilistic Cicerovian or the overbearing Machiavellian with ambitions to the heights of Urbino is not up to me. You as senator represent your choice in 3 core groups. !xx- This link goes here -xx! You must use the tools of explanation, persuasion and terror to achieve conviction to your own factional ends. !xx- This link goes here -xx! These core groups have something to do with labor, because though a sensitive subject, it is so because it is a universal subject; we must all work in a capacity related to work. !xx- This link goes here -xx!
The game will be fueled by user contributions. Actions that created legacies, no matter the scale. !xx- This link goes here -xx! Some standards of categorization should be expected to appeal to other sentient people learning and thinking of these intelligence reports. !xx- This link goes here -xx!
You must fulfill gaining benefits for your petitioners. I have built the framework on the pillars of philosophy, social sciences that don't appear to overlap more with each other than they do with the philosophies, the 4x strategy game strategy paths, and the subject of community. You will need some great density of foreknowledge of what you mean to achieve. With the roleplaying game being a variation of warfare strategy, the placement of objective values for greatest potential impact (is what the game is built upon.) In summary, the roleplaying game could be a game of strategy for externalizing the lifestyles of NPCs into the options given to a player. This would be a great time to talk about what a game itself is. My opinion on a game is that it is a simulation (a simple order of events representing knowable values) that operates as a mechanical drill (a solvable answer to knowable values.) Games actually do people a world of good I think; being that without simulations, people still fill those spaces they cannot influence with delusions.
You must speak in a framework to make sense of your subjects for those who hear you. !xx- This link goes here -xx! However on the heels of this is the question of how you read the text around you. This isn't just a game, it is a gamified conversation with the intent to help you relax. Therefore I would impose a relatively insane option: If you disagree with it, take that walk of a mile in your opponents shoes. By using a subject that you disagree with without imposing changes on it, you should rush ahead and then play fast and loose with their speech; filling in their terms with any contradictions, retractions and gap fillers that you would would like to make. Reading the text of others in this way, and replying to them in this way, should also give you a good reason to read what ultimately doesn't impact you.
Your interest groups will be surrounded by subboards. The challenges made by competing interest groups should be expected to come form those places. As a player, it is my hope that you might channel some of your lifetime old internet anguishes here and give yourself some relief. People on the internet are difficult because common and central economy is difficult, but common and central economy is (in appearance) one part of social networking. As much should be integrated into your biology as a human. This game is a commonwealth, and that is the kind of bank of resource that this commonwealth is. They are not the easy representations of the subject; in placing these preselected groupings of topics, I placed the subjects so that hopefully they will muddy the grander subject, so that an individual could enjoy the individualism of being an observer as opposed to the common redundancy of thinking among the group. These areas are full freedom graffiti zones with the hopes that the chaos of intellectual spite and of intellectual promiscuousness will create an vortex of competition. However I would like the top layer of each board to represent the senatorial decorum (despite all lack of control efforts to enforce it.) I recommend to you as a player that you just try as experiment to only feed the troll if they're in a subboard. On a more personal note: I also hope that the subboard will find some value as a place to work out kinks in a subject. The kinks may in fact be rigidly limited by (and to some degree are probably contaminated by) an overzealous contraction to subjective seeds of knowledge you ostensibly want to know. To achieve the working out of those kinks: all I can do is tell you what my hopes, dreams, and passions are.
As just a reminder: If this is the kind of invention that you like about me, won't you contribute to me by joining my patreon - patreon.com/iSamCrozier? If I can get paid to do it, I will continue converting my years of therapy into social inventions.
You will play the part of a senator. Whether you are the nhilistic Cicerovian or the overbearing Machiavellian with ambitions to the heights of Urbino is not up to me. You as senator represent your choice in 3 core groups. !xx- This link goes here -xx! You must use the tools of explanation, persuasion and terror to achieve conviction to your own factional ends. !xx- This link goes here -xx! These core groups have something to do with labor, because though a sensitive subject, it is so because it is a universal subject; we must all work in a capacity related to work. !xx- This link goes here -xx!
The game will be fueled by user contributions. Actions that created legacies, no matter the scale. !xx- This link goes here -xx! Some standards of categorization should be expected to appeal to other sentient people learning and thinking of these intelligence reports. !xx- This link goes here -xx!
You must fulfill gaining benefits for your petitioners. I have built the framework on the pillars of philosophy, social sciences that don't appear to overlap more with each other than they do with the philosophies, the 4x strategy game strategy paths, and the subject of community. You will need some great density of foreknowledge of what you mean to achieve. With the roleplaying game being a variation of warfare strategy, the placement of objective values for greatest potential impact (is what the game is built upon.) In summary, the roleplaying game could be a game of strategy for externalizing the lifestyles of NPCs into the options given to a player. This would be a great time to talk about what a game itself is. My opinion on a game is that it is a simulation (a simple order of events representing knowable values) that operates as a mechanical drill (a solvable answer to knowable values.) Games actually do people a world of good I think; being that without simulations, people still fill those spaces they cannot influence with delusions.
You must speak in a framework to make sense of your subjects for those who hear you. !xx- This link goes here -xx! However on the heels of this is the question of how you read the text around you. This isn't just a game, it is a gamified conversation with the intent to help you relax. Therefore I would impose a relatively insane option: If you disagree with it, take that walk of a mile in your opponents shoes. By using a subject that you disagree with without imposing changes on it, you should rush ahead and then play fast and loose with their speech; filling in their terms with any contradictions, retractions and gap fillers that you would would like to make. Reading the text of others in this way, and replying to them in this way, should also give you a good reason to read what ultimately doesn't impact you.
Your interest groups will be surrounded by subboards. The challenges made by competing interest groups should be expected to come form those places. As a player, it is my hope that you might channel some of your lifetime old internet anguishes here and give yourself some relief. People on the internet are difficult because common and central economy is difficult, but common and central economy is (in appearance) one part of social networking. As much should be integrated into your biology as a human. This game is a commonwealth, and that is the kind of bank of resource that this commonwealth is. They are not the easy representations of the subject; in placing these preselected groupings of topics, I placed the subjects so that hopefully they will muddy the grander subject, so that an individual could enjoy the individualism of being an observer as opposed to the common redundancy of thinking among the group. These areas are full freedom graffiti zones with the hopes that the chaos of intellectual spite and of intellectual promiscuousness will create an vortex of competition. However I would like the top layer of each board to represent the senatorial decorum (despite all lack of control efforts to enforce it.) I recommend to you as a player that you just try as experiment to only feed the troll if they're in a subboard. On a more personal note: I also hope that the subboard will find some value as a place to work out kinks in a subject. The kinks may in fact be rigidly limited by (and to some degree are probably contaminated by) an overzealous contraction to subjective seeds of knowledge you ostensibly want to know. To achieve the working out of those kinks: all I can do is tell you what my hopes, dreams, and passions are.
As just a reminder: If this is the kind of invention that you like about me, won't you contribute to me by joining my patreon - patreon.com/iSamCrozier? If I can get paid to do it, I will continue converting my years of therapy into social inventions.